<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Forced Litigation in CBIC – reasons thereof</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9812</link>
    <description>Mechanical pro revenue decision making within CBIC has produced avoidable litigation by pressurised adjudicators who issue low quality show cause notices, ignore natural justice, and fail to follow binding precedents and departmental litigation directives; the result is numerous one sided Orders in Original and Orders in Appeal that sustain judicial rebuke and a low appellate success rate for the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Forced Litigation in CBIC – reasons thereof</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9812</link>
      <description>Mechanical pro revenue decision making within CBIC has produced avoidable litigation by pressurised adjudicators who issue low quality show cause notices, ignore natural justice, and fail to follow binding precedents and departmental litigation directives; the result is numerous one sided Orders in Original and Orders in Appeal that sustain judicial rebuke and a low appellate success rate for the department.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>