<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408121</link>
    <description>The court allowed the extension of time for filing attested affidavits and deposition of court fee, with exceptions. It set aside the flawed assessment order and consequential notices, granting relief to the petitioner. Emphasizing the statutory requirement for personal hearings, the court directed the respondents to provide a personal hearing for the petitioner&#039;s authorized representative via video-conferencing, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408121</link>
      <description>The court allowed the extension of time for filing attested affidavits and deposition of court fee, with exceptions. It set aside the flawed assessment order and consequential notices, granting relief to the petitioner. Emphasizing the statutory requirement for personal hearings, the court directed the respondents to provide a personal hearing for the petitioner&#039;s authorized representative via video-conferencing, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>