<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 16 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408120</link>
    <description>The judgment granted exemption from filing sworn/notarised affidavits with exceptions, directing submission within three days. Service acceptance was noted by specific individuals for the respondents. The court tasked Mr. Aggarwal to explore the possibility of respondent no. 3 issuing a notification. Mr. Venkatraman was instructed to present case facts to the GST Council. The matter was listed for further hearing on 28.05.2021 for ongoing proceedings and updates on parties&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 16 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408120</link>
      <description>The judgment granted exemption from filing sworn/notarised affidavits with exceptions, directing submission within three days. Service acceptance was noted by specific individuals for the respondents. The court tasked Mr. Aggarwal to explore the possibility of respondent no. 3 issuing a notification. Mr. Venkatraman was instructed to present case facts to the GST Council. The matter was listed for further hearing on 28.05.2021 for ongoing proceedings and updates on parties&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>