https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408101 The court interfered with the attachment orders issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 against the petitioner company. It directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 1 Crore within a week to vacate the orders, emphasizing the protection of constitutional rights. The court found no justification for further account attachment, considering funds already paid and ongoing investigations. Transparent account maintenance was mandated, and the respondents were instructed to expedite the investigation. The Writ Petition was allowed with no costs incurred, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Wed, 26 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408101 The court interfered with the attachment orders issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 against the petitioner company. It directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 1 Crore within a week to vacate the orders, emphasizing the protection of constitutional rights. The court found no justification for further account attachment, considering funds already paid and ongoing investigations. Transparent account maintenance was mandated, and the respondents were instructed to expedite the investigation. The Writ Petition was allowed with no costs incurred, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408101