<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408099</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the Petitioner to file a paper return for the assessment year 2020-2021 before 31st May 2021, subject to further orders. The Court refrained from deciding on the justification of not filing an electronic return and kept all contentions open for future consideration. The challenge to the validity of Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 was acknowledged, and the Court maintained that the compliance aspect would be addressed at a later stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 08:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408099</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the Petitioner to file a paper return for the assessment year 2020-2021 before 31st May 2021, subject to further orders. The Court refrained from deciding on the justification of not filing an electronic return and kept all contentions open for future consideration. The challenge to the validity of Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 was acknowledged, and the Court maintained that the compliance aspect would be addressed at a later stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>