<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 961 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271B for A.Y. 2000-01 on a firm for failing to file the tax audit report on time, as the reasons provided for the delay were deemed insufficient. Subsequent appeals for A.Ys. 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04 were also dismissed based on identical issues and findings from the initial appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 08:35:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 961 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271B for A.Y. 2000-01 on a firm for failing to file the tax audit report on time, as the reasons provided for the delay were deemed insufficient. Subsequent appeals for A.Ys. 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04 were also dismissed based on identical issues and findings from the initial appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>