<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 960 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer as they were based on borrowed satisfaction, lacked independent verification, and the reasons recorded did not justify the belief of income escapement. The Tribunal also held that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to make additions on grounds not forming part of the reasons recorded for reopening. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 960 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer as they were based on borrowed satisfaction, lacked independent verification, and the reasons recorded did not justify the belief of income escapement. The Tribunal also held that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to make additions on grounds not forming part of the reasons recorded for reopening. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>