<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408067</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority may direct a promoter&#039;s settlement proposal to be placed before the Committee of Creditors for consideration and voting where no express legal bar exists, relying on residuary and inherent powers to prevent injustice; the commercial merits remain for the Committee of Creditors to assess. The second settlement proposal was therefore directed to be placed before the Committee. A request for a fresh independent valuation of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets, and supply of that report to the applicant, was rejected because valuation had already been undertaken in the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408067</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority may direct a promoter&#039;s settlement proposal to be placed before the Committee of Creditors for consideration and voting where no express legal bar exists, relying on residuary and inherent powers to prevent injustice; the commercial merits remain for the Committee of Creditors to assess. The second settlement proposal was therefore directed to be placed before the Committee. A request for a fresh independent valuation of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets, and supply of that report to the applicant, was rejected because valuation had already been undertaken in the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>