https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408056 The appeal was filed against an order-in-original passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-F, Bharatpur, regarding the confiscation of goods and conveyance under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant, involved in trading stones of marbles and granite, faced discrepancies in loaded quantity during interception by CGST officers. Despite objections raised by the appellant, the authority confirmed the demand based on discrepancies in goods quantity, leading to the confiscation of goods and conveyance. The appeal challenging the decision was dismissed, upholding the confiscation and fines imposed due to intentional evasion of GST payment through excess loading of goods. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408056 The appeal was filed against an order-in-original passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-F, Bharatpur, regarding the confiscation of goods and conveyance under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant, involved in trading stones of marbles and granite, faced discrepancies in loaded quantity during interception by CGST officers. Despite objections raised by the appellant, the authority confirmed the demand based on discrepancies in goods quantity, leading to the confiscation of goods and conveyance. The appeal challenging the decision was dismissed, upholding the confiscation and fines imposed due to intentional evasion of GST payment through excess loading of goods. Case-Laws GST Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408056