<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1623 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH—V</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295345</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the application seeking a 45-day extension for the completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to the grounds presented not justifying an extension beyond the 330-day limit, as they were not related to litigation delays. The tribunal emphasized that while extensions could be granted in exceptional cases, the general rule is that 330 days is the outer limit for the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1623 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH—V</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295345</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the application seeking a 45-day extension for the completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to the grounds presented not justifying an extension beyond the 330-day limit, as they were not related to litigation delays. The tribunal emphasized that while extensions could be granted in exceptional cases, the general rule is that 330 days is the outer limit for the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>