https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295356 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction over an interlocutory arbitral order refusing additional documents is to be exercised sparingly, only to correct patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or breach of natural justice. Because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 adopts minimal judicial intervention and provides appeal only for orders made appealable under Section 37, such non-appealable tribunal orders are ordinarily to be challenged after the award in proceedings under Section 34. No exceptional ground for interference was shown, so the revision was not maintainable and interference was declined. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 May 2021 08:34:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295356 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction over an interlocutory arbitral order refusing additional documents is to be exercised sparingly, only to correct patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or breach of natural justice. Because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 adopts minimal judicial intervention and provides appeal only for orders made appealable under Section 37, such non-appealable tribunal orders are ordinarily to be challenged after the award in proceedings under Section 34. No exceptional ground for interference was shown, so the revision was not maintainable and interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295356