https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295340 The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the lower court's decision that the civil suit seeking compensation for false implication in a criminal case was barred by limitation under Article 74 of the Limitation Act. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the suit was for damages with a three-year limitation period, finding it to be related to malicious prosecution. Despite the exclusion of certain periods, the court upheld the dismissal of the suit based on the one-year limitation period under Article 74. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 May 2021 15:42:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295340 The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the lower court's decision that the civil suit seeking compensation for false implication in a criminal case was barred by limitation under Article 74 of the Limitation Act. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the suit was for damages with a three-year limitation period, finding it to be related to malicious prosecution. Despite the exclusion of certain periods, the court upheld the dismissal of the suit based on the one-year limitation period under Article 74. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295340