<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 932 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408053</link>
    <description>The Court held that the suit for malicious prosecution was filed within the limitation period prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1963. The arguments that the suit was barred by Section 155(2) of the Customs Act were rejected, as this provision does not apply to suits. Therefore, the suit was deemed maintainable, and the petition challenging the Trial Court&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Trial Court was directed to expedite the suit&#039;s adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 932 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408053</link>
      <description>The Court held that the suit for malicious prosecution was filed within the limitation period prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1963. The arguments that the suit was barred by Section 155(2) of the Customs Act were rejected, as this provision does not apply to suits. Therefore, the suit was deemed maintainable, and the petition challenging the Trial Court&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Trial Court was directed to expedite the suit&#039;s adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>