<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 918 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) exceeded jurisdiction under section 263, as the directions issued for de-novo assessment were beyond the scrutiny criteria for the relevant year. The PCIT&#039;s order was deemed erroneous, lacking in application of mind and violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal standards in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 918 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) exceeded jurisdiction under section 263, as the directions issued for de-novo assessment were beyond the scrutiny criteria for the relevant year. The PCIT&#039;s order was deemed erroneous, lacking in application of mind and violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal standards in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>