<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 916 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had made full and transparent disclosures, the legal issues were complex, and the penalty notice was invalid due to its ambiguity. Therefore, the grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed, and the appeal was not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 916 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had made full and transparent disclosures, the legal issues were complex, and the penalty notice was invalid due to its ambiguity. Therefore, the grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed, and the appeal was not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>