<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 913 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 51,051,656 made by the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing the principle of consistency in accepting the opening stock as genuine based on past assessments and legal precedents. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition as unexplained income unsustainable, citing factual inconsistencies and similarities to a Delhi High Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 913 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 51,051,656 made by the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing the principle of consistency in accepting the opening stock as genuine based on past assessments and legal precedents. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition as unexplained income unsustainable, citing factual inconsistencies and similarities to a Delhi High Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>