<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 902 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408023</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant under Sections 112 and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the importance of following due process and proper assessment procedures before imposing additional financial obligations on importers. The tribunal held that the duty, interest, and penalty paid by the appellant under Section 28(5) were sufficient, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 902 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408023</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant under Sections 112 and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the importance of following due process and proper assessment procedures before imposing additional financial obligations on importers. The tribunal held that the duty, interest, and penalty paid by the appellant under Section 28(5) were sufficient, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>