<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 898 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered the application seeking exclusion and extension of time periods in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It allowed the exclusion of certain days due to specific reasons such as the stay of the CIRP by the Adjudicating Authority and impact of Covid-19, while rejecting others based on legal provisions and factual circumstances. The Tribunal emphasized the fixed timeline for CIRP completion and the necessity of justifying exclusions with concrete evidence. Overall, the judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims with legal references and factual support in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 19:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 898 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered the application seeking exclusion and extension of time periods in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It allowed the exclusion of certain days due to specific reasons such as the stay of the CIRP by the Adjudicating Authority and impact of Covid-19, while rejecting others based on legal provisions and factual circumstances. The Tribunal emphasized the fixed timeline for CIRP completion and the necessity of justifying exclusions with concrete evidence. Overall, the judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims with legal references and factual support in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>