<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 895 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408016</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenged the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee and consider the property value based on the DVO report. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the long term capital gain using the DVO value, aligning with precedent. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, favoring the Revenue and emphasizing adherence to legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 895 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408016</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenged the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee and consider the property value based on the DVO report. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the long term capital gain using the DVO value, aligning with precedent. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, favoring the Revenue and emphasizing adherence to legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>