<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1376 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295319</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that no disallowance could be made under Section 40(a)(ia) for shortfall in TDS due to differences in understanding or opinion on taxability. Consequently, the ITAT reversed the findings of the lower authorities and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as infructuous since they were not argued or urged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1376 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295319</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that no disallowance could be made under Section 40(a)(ia) for shortfall in TDS due to differences in understanding or opinion on taxability. Consequently, the ITAT reversed the findings of the lower authorities and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as infructuous since they were not argued or urged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>