<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1611 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295336</link>
    <description>The Court ordered the immediate unconditional release of goods seized under a panchnama to the Petitioner due to the absence of a show cause notice within the mandated time limit. Despite the directive, the Customs Department failed to comply, leading to further legal action by the Petitioner. The Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with its orders and criticized the Customs Department for initiating multiple proceedings instead of following the initial order. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs was directed to provide an explanation for the re-assessment of goods without proper notice, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1611 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295336</link>
      <description>The Court ordered the immediate unconditional release of goods seized under a panchnama to the Petitioner due to the absence of a show cause notice within the mandated time limit. Despite the directive, the Customs Department failed to comply, leading to further legal action by the Petitioner. The Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with its orders and criticized the Customs Department for initiating multiple proceedings instead of following the initial order. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs was directed to provide an explanation for the re-assessment of goods without proper notice, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>