<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 752 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295333</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to verify if the appellant had operated under Notification No. 214/1986-C.E., potentially exempting them from paying excise duty. If not, the appellant would be required to pay duty as applicable to any job worker. The appeals were disposed of by remand for further examination and decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 08:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 752 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295333</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to verify if the appellant had operated under Notification No. 214/1986-C.E., potentially exempting them from paying excise duty. If not, the appellant would be required to pay duty as applicable to any job worker. The appeals were disposed of by remand for further examination and decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>