<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest Demand for Reversed Credit in 2009 Deemed Timely, Not Barred by Limitation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58143</link>
    <description>Levy of Interest - carry forward of excess credit - In the present case, the Appellant reversed the credit in September 2009 but since failed to discharge the interest of the same, consequently, within a period of one year, the interest was demanded from the Appellant by issuing a notice to the Appellant. Hence, the demand for interest is not barred by limitation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 13:39:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 13:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest Demand for Reversed Credit in 2009 Deemed Timely, Not Barred by Limitation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58143</link>
      <description>Levy of Interest - carry forward of excess credit - In the present case, the Appellant reversed the credit in September 2009 but since failed to discharge the interest of the same, consequently, within a period of one year, the interest was demanded from the Appellant by issuing a notice to the Appellant. Hence, the demand for interest is not barred by limitation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 13:39:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>