<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1107 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295313</link>
    <description>Repeated non-appearance after more than four adjournments justified rejection of the assessee&#039;s further adjournment request, and the appeal was treated as unadmitted for want of prosecution. The Tribunal recorded that the appeal stood dismissed because no one appeared despite notice and prior opportunities. At the same time, it preserved a procedural remedy by granting liberty to seek recall of the dismissal if the assessee can show sufficient cause for absence on the hearing date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1107 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295313</link>
      <description>Repeated non-appearance after more than four adjournments justified rejection of the assessee&#039;s further adjournment request, and the appeal was treated as unadmitted for want of prosecution. The Tribunal recorded that the appeal stood dismissed because no one appeared despite notice and prior opportunities. At the same time, it preserved a procedural remedy by granting liberty to seek recall of the dismissal if the assessee can show sufficient cause for absence on the hearing date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>