<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 18 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25535</link>
    <description>Amounts collected in the course of business towards statutory tax liability and mixed with the assessee&#039;s own funds were treated as trading receipts, because tax collections received during trade assume that character when not held separately for the payors. The distinction between sales tax and purchase tax did not alter that principle, as both are statutory levies collected in the course of business. The amounts were therefore includible in total income against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 18 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25535</link>
      <description>Amounts collected in the course of business towards statutory tax liability and mixed with the assessee&#039;s own funds were treated as trading receipts, because tax collections received during trade assume that character when not held separately for the payors. The distinction between sales tax and purchase tax did not alter that principle, as both are statutory levies collected in the course of business. The amounts were therefore includible in total income against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>