<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 881 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408002</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the respondents had jurisdiction to initiate assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2006-07. It was determined that the petitioner had a business connection in India through Watanmal India, constituting a permanent establishment under Section 9 of the Act. Additionally, the court found that the procedural requirements under Section 151 were complied with, and the reassessment under Section 147 was deemed valid based on sufficient reasons provided by the respondents. The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s arguments and allowed the assessment proceedings to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 881 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408002</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the respondents had jurisdiction to initiate assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2006-07. It was determined that the petitioner had a business connection in India through Watanmal India, constituting a permanent establishment under Section 9 of the Act. Additionally, the court found that the procedural requirements under Section 151 were complied with, and the reassessment under Section 147 was deemed valid based on sufficient reasons provided by the respondents. The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s arguments and allowed the assessment proceedings to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>