<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 877 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407998</link>
    <description>Consideration for software supplied to Indian customers under restricted end-user or distribution arrangements was not royalty under the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of the India-Israel DTAA, because the transferee received only a limited licence to use the software and no copyright, reproduction right, or other interest in the underlying work. The payment was therefore characterised as consideration for sale of a copyrighted article, not a grant of rights in copyright, so the royalty charging provisions did not apply and no income arose on that basis in India. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 877 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407998</link>
      <description>Consideration for software supplied to Indian customers under restricted end-user or distribution arrangements was not royalty under the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of the India-Israel DTAA, because the transferee received only a limited licence to use the software and no copyright, reproduction right, or other interest in the underlying work. The payment was therefore characterised as consideration for sale of a copyrighted article, not a grant of rights in copyright, so the royalty charging provisions did not apply and no income arose on that basis in India. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>