<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 875 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407996</link>
    <description>For admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a dispute must pre-date the statutory demand notice; a later civil suit, complaint, or unsupported laboratory report does not establish a pre-existing dispute. On the facts discussed, the correspondence showed only a quality complaint that did not mature into a contemporaneous dispute over the transaction, so the Section 9 application remained maintainable. Procedural objections to the pronouncement of the order, including delay and bench composition issues under the NCLT Rules, were treated as irregularities only, because no prejudice was shown and the order was otherwise correct on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 875 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407996</link>
      <description>For admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a dispute must pre-date the statutory demand notice; a later civil suit, complaint, or unsupported laboratory report does not establish a pre-existing dispute. On the facts discussed, the correspondence showed only a quality complaint that did not mature into a contemporaneous dispute over the transaction, so the Section 9 application remained maintainable. Procedural objections to the pronouncement of the order, including delay and bench composition issues under the NCLT Rules, were treated as irregularities only, because no prejudice was shown and the order was otherwise correct on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>