<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 868 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407989</link>
    <description>Excise duty deposited under protest could not be rejected as a refund or appropriated towards alleged short payment without a show cause notice under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, because the statutory recovery mechanism requires notice unless the amount is voluntarily paid under the prescribed process. The absence of notice vitiated the proposed recovery and refund rejection. Interest on the same amount also could not be appropriated, as the underlying refund rejection was unsustainable and no separate demand notice for interest had been served. The assessee was therefore entitled to refund of the amount paid under protest, and the consequential interest appropriation also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 868 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407989</link>
      <description>Excise duty deposited under protest could not be rejected as a refund or appropriated towards alleged short payment without a show cause notice under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, because the statutory recovery mechanism requires notice unless the amount is voluntarily paid under the prescribed process. The absence of notice vitiated the proposed recovery and refund rejection. Interest on the same amount also could not be appropriated, as the underlying refund rejection was unsustainable and no separate demand notice for interest had been served. The assessee was therefore entitled to refund of the amount paid under protest, and the consequential interest appropriation also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>