<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the addition of Rs. 11,72,434 as unexplained expenditure baseless and lacking proper evidence. The ld. AO failed to establish a connection between the assessee and the alleged unexplained expenditure, leading to the deletion of the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2011-12 in ITA No. 6785/Mum/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the addition of Rs. 11,72,434 as unexplained expenditure baseless and lacking proper evidence. The ld. AO failed to establish a connection between the assessee and the alleged unexplained expenditure, leading to the deletion of the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2011-12 in ITA No. 6785/Mum/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>