<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 855 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407976</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Application filed by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor for non-payment of dues. The Authority found evidence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties, emphasizing the necessity of a genuine dispute for rejecting an insolvency application. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions regarding the nature of the debt and suppression of facts were considered, leading to the dismissal of the application. The importance of a plausible contention requiring further investigation and the existence of a genuine dispute were highlighted in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 855 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407976</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Application filed by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor for non-payment of dues. The Authority found evidence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties, emphasizing the necessity of a genuine dispute for rejecting an insolvency application. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions regarding the nature of the debt and suppression of facts were considered, leading to the dismissal of the application. The importance of a plausible contention requiring further investigation and the existence of a genuine dispute were highlighted in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>