<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of interest and emphasizing that the allegations of wrongful credit must be substantiated. The verification confirmed the presence of the capital goods, leading to the dismissal of the allegations and the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of interest and emphasizing that the allegations of wrongful credit must be substantiated. The verification confirmed the presence of the capital goods, leading to the dismissal of the allegations and the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>