https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295301 A High Court is bound to follow a later Supreme Court decision that authoritatively explains an earlier larger-bench ruling, even in forfeiture proceedings. The later interpretation clarified that a proved nexus between the detenu's money and the property sought to be forfeited is not required in every case. On that basis, the High Court cannot refuse forfeiture relief by adopting a different reading merely because another Supreme Court decision was distinguished on its facts. The absence of a demonstrated link or nexus therefore did not justify interference, and the forfeiture challenge failed. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 May 2021 08:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295301 A High Court is bound to follow a later Supreme Court decision that authoritatively explains an earlier larger-bench ruling, even in forfeiture proceedings. The later interpretation clarified that a proved nexus between the detenu's money and the property sought to be forfeited is not required in every case. On that basis, the High Court cannot refuse forfeiture relief by adopting a different reading merely because another Supreme Court decision was distinguished on its facts. The absence of a demonstrated link or nexus therefore did not justify interference, and the forfeiture challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295301