<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1301 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295309</link>
    <description>The SC declined to entertain the appeals because the tax effect was low and refused to interfere with the impugned order on that ground alone. The Court did not decide the substantive question of law raised in the appeals, leaving it open for future consideration. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1301 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295309</link>
      <description>The SC declined to entertain the appeals because the tax effect was low and refused to interfere with the impugned order on that ground alone. The Court did not decide the substantive question of law raised in the appeals, leaving it open for future consideration. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>