https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295308 Subsequent purchasers, assignees, power of attorney holders and similar transferees may seek a declaration that acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law. The text distinguishes challenges to the original acquisition from claims for deemed lapse, noting that the latter arises from statutory extinguishment of the acquisition and removal of the resulting encumbrance. It also explains that the expressions "person interested", "land owner" and "affected family" are given a wider meaning under the 2013 Act, extending beyond the recorded owner where compensation interests or affected rights are involved. Earlier cases denying locus in acquisition challenges are treated as inapplicable. The Delhi transfer restrictions law does not defeat this entitlement. en-us Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 May 2021 08:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295308 Subsequent purchasers, assignees, power of attorney holders and similar transferees may seek a declaration that acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law. The text distinguishes challenges to the original acquisition from claims for deemed lapse, noting that the latter arises from statutory extinguishment of the acquisition and removal of the resulting encumbrance. It also explains that the expressions "person interested", "land owner" and "affected family" are given a wider meaning under the 2013 Act, extending beyond the recorded owner where compensation interests or affected rights are involved. Earlier cases denying locus in acquisition challenges are treated as inapplicable. The Delhi transfer restrictions law does not defeat this entitlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295308