<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 654 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295288</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal upholding the cancellation of a select list for recruitment of Ticket Collectors in Lucknow Division due to malpractice. The Court held that the Divisional Manager had the authority to cancel the list with proper authorization from the General Manager. Emphasizing the need for orders to include reasons, the Court dismissed arguments regarding legitimate expectations of selected candidates, stating that such expectations arise only upon appointment according to rules. The Court concluded that the cancellation was justified to ensure a fair examination process, dismissing the special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 17:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 654 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295288</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal upholding the cancellation of a select list for recruitment of Ticket Collectors in Lucknow Division due to malpractice. The Court held that the Divisional Manager had the authority to cancel the list with proper authorization from the General Manager. Emphasizing the need for orders to include reasons, the Court dismissed arguments regarding legitimate expectations of selected candidates, stating that such expectations arise only upon appointment according to rules. The Court concluded that the cancellation was justified to ensure a fair examination process, dismissing the special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>