https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295282 The accused was convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by both the Magistrate and Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge modified the sentence to one day of imprisonment and a fine, reducing the default imprisonment to two months. The accused's denial of executing the cheque was rejected, and the appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence modification. The court emphasized the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and directed the accused to comply with the modified sentence and payment of the fine. The revision was dismissed, affirming the conviction and sentence. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 May 2021 12:01:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295282 The accused was convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by both the Magistrate and Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge modified the sentence to one day of imprisonment and a fine, reducing the default imprisonment to two months. The accused's denial of executing the cheque was rejected, and the appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence modification. The court emphasized the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and directed the accused to comply with the modified sentence and payment of the fine. The revision was dismissed, affirming the conviction and sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295282