https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295280 The text examines land reform measures affecting Rampur tenures and explains that the claimed agreements and merger arrangements did not bar abolition of jagirs, zamindaris and muafis, because such rights could not override later law or the general policy of land reform. It also notes that the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was validly extended to Rampur, and that the retrospective amendment to the definition of "estate" brought the lands within the Act without impermissible delegation. Finally, it states that the Rampur Thekedari and Pattedari Abolition Act validly applied to leaseholders and was within legislative competence, with no fatal defect in the compensation scheme. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 May 2021 11:12:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295280 The text examines land reform measures affecting Rampur tenures and explains that the claimed agreements and merger arrangements did not bar abolition of jagirs, zamindaris and muafis, because such rights could not override later law or the general policy of land reform. It also notes that the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was validly extended to Rampur, and that the retrospective amendment to the definition of "estate" brought the lands within the Act without impermissible delegation. Finally, it states that the Rampur Thekedari and Pattedari Abolition Act validly applied to leaseholders and was within legislative competence, with no fatal defect in the compensation scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295280