https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295278 The statutory scheme validly extended Uttar Pradesh rent control law to cantonment areas through notifications under the 1957 Act, because the legislature laid down a clear policy and the delegated power was confined to limited extension with necessary adaptations, not excessive delegation. The later notifications were also not invalid merely because an earlier extension had already been made. A restricted 1-9-1973 notification did not defeat jurisdiction, since the 1957 Act's deeming provision saved decrees and orders made before the later extension; accordingly, orders passed by the prescribed authority before the 17-2-1982 notification were protected. en-us Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 May 2021 10:56:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295278 The statutory scheme validly extended Uttar Pradesh rent control law to cantonment areas through notifications under the 1957 Act, because the legislature laid down a clear policy and the delegated power was confined to limited extension with necessary adaptations, not excessive delegation. The later notifications were also not invalid merely because an earlier extension had already been made. A restricted 1-9-1973 notification did not defeat jurisdiction, since the 1957 Act's deeming provision saved decrees and orders made before the later extension; accordingly, orders passed by the prescribed authority before the 17-2-1982 notification were protected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295278