<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 845 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407966</link>
    <description>A party seeking temporary injunction must first establish present possession of the suit property. Here, the appellant relied on continued possession of agricultural land, but the revenue records and pahanies showed the respondents in the possessory column, and a prior interim injunction had already been granted in the respondents&#039; specific performance suit. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the revenue entries had been taken before the revenue authorities and by statutory revision, yet the absence of a recital of delivery of possession in the agreement of sale did not prove his possession or displace the existing records. Temporary injunction was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 845 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407966</link>
      <description>A party seeking temporary injunction must first establish present possession of the suit property. Here, the appellant relied on continued possession of agricultural land, but the revenue records and pahanies showed the respondents in the possessory column, and a prior interim injunction had already been granted in the respondents&#039; specific performance suit. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the revenue entries had been taken before the revenue authorities and by statutory revision, yet the absence of a recital of delivery of possession in the agreement of sale did not prove his possession or displace the existing records. Temporary injunction was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>