<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the rectification of the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation. However, it ruled that the addition of share premium as unexplained cash credit could not stand independently after the reassessment order was quashed. The Tribunal indicated that if the reassessment order is reinstated on appeal, the addition under Section 68 would also be restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the rectification of the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation. However, it ruled that the addition of share premium as unexplained cash credit could not stand independently after the reassessment order was quashed. The Tribunal indicated that if the reassessment order is reinstated on appeal, the addition under Section 68 would also be restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>