<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 827 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to reasons beyond control. It found fault with the CIT(A)&#039;s acceptance of additional evidence without proper verification under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for fresh assessment, directing the assessee to provide documentary evidence to substantiate claims. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, restoring the matter to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 827 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to reasons beyond control. It found fault with the CIT(A)&#039;s acceptance of additional evidence without proper verification under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for fresh assessment, directing the assessee to provide documentary evidence to substantiate claims. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, restoring the matter to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>