<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to keep the classification issue open for adjudication through the pending show cause notice. The Commissioner was directed to proceed with the adjudication, allowing both parties to present evidence and the respondent to contest the proposed classification. The appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to keep the classification issue open for adjudication through the pending show cause notice. The Commissioner was directed to proceed with the adjudication, allowing both parties to present evidence and the respondent to contest the proposed classification. The appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>