<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice under Section 143(2) and rejected the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the date of furnishing the return. It deemed the approval for reopening the assessment under Section 148 as mechanical and lacking detailed reasons, thus declaring the assessment void ab initio. The Tribunal dismissed the timeliness argument for the assessment order and allowed the appeal, setting aside the tax authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice under Section 143(2) and rejected the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the date of furnishing the return. It deemed the approval for reopening the assessment under Section 148 as mechanical and lacking detailed reasons, thus declaring the assessment void ab initio. The Tribunal dismissed the timeliness argument for the assessment order and allowed the appeal, setting aside the tax authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>