<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1853 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295274</link>
    <description>Land acquisition proceedings may lapse where the authority issues a final notification but then leaves the acquisition incomplete for an unreasonably long period without passing an award or taking possession. Continued inaction in such circumstances is arbitrary, and the acquisition can be treated as abandoned by efflux of time. A subsequent purchaser is not barred from challenging the acquisition where the original owner has effectively regained the right to deal with the property. The protection of property under Article 300A also requires just compensation within a reasonable time. The writ petitions were therefore maintainable and succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1853 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295274</link>
      <description>Land acquisition proceedings may lapse where the authority issues a final notification but then leaves the acquisition incomplete for an unreasonably long period without passing an award or taking possession. Continued inaction in such circumstances is arbitrary, and the acquisition can be treated as abandoned by efflux of time. A subsequent purchaser is not barred from challenging the acquisition where the original owner has effectively regained the right to deal with the property. The protection of property under Article 300A also requires just compensation within a reasonable time. The writ petitions were therefore maintainable and succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>