https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295277 The High Court held that the tax appeal was not maintainable before them due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal related to the classification of services, which should have been brought before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Act. The Court directed the Revenue to pursue the matter through the appropriate legal channels, emphasizing adherence to jurisdictional rules in tax appeals. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 May 2021 08:33:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295277 The High Court held that the tax appeal was not maintainable before them due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal related to the classification of services, which should have been brought before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Act. The Court directed the Revenue to pursue the matter through the appropriate legal channels, emphasizing adherence to jurisdictional rules in tax appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295277