<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25521</link>
    <description>Section 273A(4) gives the Commissioner discretion to reduce or waive penalty on satisfaction of genuine hardship and cooperation in the enquiry, and writ interference is justified only where that discretion is exercised contrary to law or on extraneous considerations. On the stated facts, the 50% penalty reduction was not shown to be illegal, so no interference was warranted. The criminal complaint was also not quashed, as no ground was made out in writ proceedings. The argument based on section 279(1A) was left open for determination before the Magistrate, because its application depended on factual matters requiring investigation in the pending prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25521</link>
      <description>Section 273A(4) gives the Commissioner discretion to reduce or waive penalty on satisfaction of genuine hardship and cooperation in the enquiry, and writ interference is justified only where that discretion is exercised contrary to law or on extraneous considerations. On the stated facts, the 50% penalty reduction was not shown to be illegal, so no interference was warranted. The criminal complaint was also not quashed, as no ground was made out in writ proceedings. The argument based on section 279(1A) was left open for determination before the Magistrate, because its application depended on factual matters requiring investigation in the pending prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>