https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25519 The court dismissed the writ petition, rejecting all three contentions raised by the petitioner. The court emphasized the petitioner's delay in raising objections and the lack of specific details in the petition. The court also noted the purchaser's deposit of the sale amount and the petitioner's continued possession of the property. The request for an extension of time to pay the amount was also denied. The writ petition was dismissed with costs, and the advocate's fee was set at Rs. 500. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:03:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25519 The court dismissed the writ petition, rejecting all three contentions raised by the petitioner. The court emphasized the petitioner's delay in raising objections and the lack of specific details in the petition. The court also noted the purchaser's deposit of the sale amount and the petitioner's continued possession of the property. The request for an extension of time to pay the amount was also denied. The writ petition was dismissed with costs, and the advocate's fee was set at Rs. 500. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 21 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25519