<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 800 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, ruling that the assessee&#039;s request for review through rectification was beyond the scope of powers granted under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the earlier decision and clarified that rectification is limited to correcting mistakes apparent from the record, not errors of judgment. The order was pronounced on 25th May 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 08:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 800 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, ruling that the assessee&#039;s request for review through rectification was beyond the scope of powers granted under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the earlier decision and clarified that rectification is limited to correcting mistakes apparent from the record, not errors of judgment. The order was pronounced on 25th May 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>