https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295243 An Ordinance repealing an earlier amendment does not need Presidential instructions or assent merely because the repealed amendment had previously received assent under the repugnancy doctrine; repeal removes the provision and does not itself create repugnancy. Promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation cannot invalidate legislation or an Ordinance. The Court also stated that where commencement of a statutory provision is left to executive discretion, mandamus cannot compel the Government to bring it into force, and once repealed the provision cannot be enforced. On possession, a true owner or statutory authority cannot dispossess a person in settled possession except in accordance with law, but no blanket injunction protects occupants without settled possession. en-us Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 May 2021 18:15:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295243 An Ordinance repealing an earlier amendment does not need Presidential instructions or assent merely because the repealed amendment had previously received assent under the repugnancy doctrine; repeal removes the provision and does not itself create repugnancy. Promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation cannot invalidate legislation or an Ordinance. The Court also stated that where commencement of a statutory provision is left to executive discretion, mandamus cannot compel the Government to bring it into force, and once repealed the provision cannot be enforced. On possession, a true owner or statutory authority cannot dispossess a person in settled possession except in accordance with law, but no blanket injunction protects occupants without settled possession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295243